Saturday, February 13, 2010

The Commodity Fetish

Sound kinky? Really kind of disturbing when you understand the concept, how it works, and how we're all implicated by it. Fetish here is used not in the perverted sense, but in the following manner:

fet⋅ish /ˈfɛtɪʃ, ˈfitɪʃ/

--noun
1. an object regarded with awe as being the embodiment or habitation of a potent spirit or as having magical potency.
2. any object, idea, etc., eliciting unquestioning reverence, respect, or devotion: to make a fetish of high grades.

Combine that with

com⋅mod⋅i⋅ty /kə'mɒdɪti/

–noun, plural -ties.
1. an article of trade or commerce, esp. a product as distinguished from a service.
2. something of use, advantage, or value.

...and you get the phrase coined by Karl Marx.

(Quickly, before I lose whatever radically conservative audience I might have, you should know I voted for Ron Paul in the primary.) Karl Marx pointed out something that is true, and whether or not you agree with his solutions to economic problems, he was right about the way capitalist societies function in regards to stuff, at least in recognizing the phenomenon of the commodity fetish.

If you have ever eaten a hot-dog, you have experienced the commodity fetish at work.

To get a little bit of perspective, consider this family heirloom:

This is a small, framed portion of a quilt, made ca. 1850 AD/CE. It is the result of a team effort of a mother and daughter team, distant matriarchs of my wife's family. The two ladies harvested the flax and spun it into linen, sheared the sheep, spun and dyed that wool, then worked together to weave this beautiful quilt! There's a story about hiding some items (perhaps this quilt) from raiding Confederate soldiers, but in order to consume that entertaining story, you'll have to get together with us in person and listen to my lovely wife tell the tale, it really is hers to tell.

What does this have to do with commodities and fetishes? Well, by way of this example, 150 years ago, if you were in need or want for a quilt, no problem! Just go harvest some flax, spin it into linen, along with the wool you sheared off of your own sheep, dye it with... i have no idea, and then spend a month or two of your spare time weaving it into a blanket. This is the way that most "products" of human invention have been produced for thousands of years--in the home.

Not so in an industrialized capitalist society, especially one operating on a global economy. If we want a blanket or quilt, we go to Target and pick one out. It's probably made in China. We might choose it based on its level of comfort, its insulating qualities, the way it works or doesn't work with the decorating scheme in our living room, or it's price. And we take the thing home and enjoy it, put it to use, until it gets stained or torn, or we decide it just doesn't go with anything, and then we give it to a charity or the landfill and it becomes the charity or landfill's problem.

Today we purchase and use items with little or no regard to the questions concerning their origin, the safety of the workers who produced the item, perhaps with little or no questions about the safety or the quality of the item itself. When it's there in the store we rarely ask ourselves a question deeper than, "Do I want this?" or "Am I willing to spend x amount on this?" We're primarily concerned with the item's apparent value in and of itself, with little or no thought given to the labor or work that goes into producing such an item. And how can we? We all use a lot of stuff! We don't have time to research the origins of everything in the supermarket, and why should we? What does it matter?

It matters because someone is paying the price for me to have all the things that I want at relatively little or no cost to myself. Likewise, someone is benefiting from taking advantage of human beings and the boon that comes from ignorant bliss.

Take the hot-dog for instance. That hot-dog probably has the unwanted meat from about 500 cows or more, all mixed in to that one little homogenized link, and most of that meat has probably been treated with ammonia. If that weren't gross enough, I can look on the package and see the number of fat grams and chemicals that are contained in it. But the real kicker is that those cows were probably slaughtered by a person with no other options for employment, being payed a measly wage, working in dangerous conditions all so that I could enjoy that meat-like delicacy as part of my 4th-of-July or camping experience. But if I think about all of that, I might not want to eat the hot dog. And Oscar Meyer and "Bar-S" want to keep it that way. Often, I like to go with Hebrew National, but is it really that much better? How do I really know?

The truth is if I want to eat hot-dogs, I have to participate in all the evil--potential or real--of eating that hot dog. How much is the hot dog worth to me? What about my $20 cell phone? I've had it for 6 months and it only now occurs to me to check to see where it was made. When I take it apart and remove the battery it says it was "Made in Mexico." I wonder who made it. I wonder how old that person was, what their name is. Do they have a family? Were they paid well? How many phones or parts of phones like mine do they make in a day?

Movies like Food Inc. and websites like the Story of Stuff* attempt to disabuse us of commodity fetishism, but the truth of the matter is that we've all been conditioned for years to not think about the resources or labor that go into the products we buy, and to stop consuming all together and live a completely different lifestyle is probably not desirable or possible for most of us. At the same time, I believe in a just God who will one day judge the living and the dead. I am responsible for how I spend my dollars, or how I don't spend my dollars. In the parable of the sheep and the goats, it's not the evil that was actively done, but the good that wasn't done by supposedly good people just passively living their lives that condemns the "goats." As much as I'd like to not think that God might want me to actually go without certain items I find "essential" to my daily life, to not entertain such a possibility, in view of Scripture, seems a little foolish.

Is the comfort of my myriad of consumer choices worth the injustice it may cause? Can I really get away with a plea of ignorance before a God that knows everything? How do I live in my own culture without abandoning God or without becoming a reactionary?

*I find this 20 minute video to be a bit over-simplified, but does an OK job of raising some questions about the big picture of consumerism's effect on everything.

6 comments:

  1. Not worried about alienating your radically liberal readers, eh? I see how it is. :)

    I went to school 45 miles from the ecovillage you linked back when I was a young vegetarian full of ideas, and I always thought I would end up living in such an environment... Now five years later, here I am in a white-carpeted drywall apartment with the heat on, having brats for dinner. How that came about is a long story, but what I do know is that there are ways to live a less cruel, less destructive life and still be a part of the culture at large. The No Impact Project or the Center for a New American Dream all have some good pointers. I think there's no cut-and-dried answer to the question "How do I live in my own culture without abandoning God or becoming a reactionary?"-- it's a process.

    I think a large portion of the resistance to the idea that conscious consumption is a moral imperative is that most of us don't want to take on another set of rules that we might break and subsequently feel guilty about. And can you blame us? Guilt can be a highly destructive state of being. I think to make progress in an area like this, you (and by you I mean all of us) have to embrace the concept of progress, not perfection, which is something Christians have a really hard time with in my experience. We want purification NOW! And changing habits just doesn't work that way. You (again in the collective sense) have to accept that you were born into this culture and you are starting from there; that your urges are at least somewhat trained against you and that an occasional lapse (oops! forgot my reusable bags again) is not cause for the hearty self-flagellation Christians love so much. It's just a lapse. You have to maintain your resolve to do better without killing yourself over the mistake. It's also frustrating when there's no road map to success; one day you think that this product is fair trade; the next day you find out it isn't. You have to be able to carry on knowing that tomorrow, you could find out you wasted your efforts.

    Anyway, those are my rambling thoughts. Great post!

    Sadie
    -radically liberal hot-dog lover

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great rambling thoughts Sadie!

    I whole-heatedly welcome the radically liberal audience by the way. I just don't want to be pigeon-holed, and I certainly don't want to do any pigeon-holing. I figured you (in the collective sense) tree-hugging hippies wouldn't be alarmed by my Marx reference. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Have you read "The Jungle"? That book was my first real exposure to what happens "behind the scenes" and what people will do for work, money, and to simply survive. Kudos to you for being honest about your own struggles with consumerism while also trying to change and help us to change, too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "The truth is if I want to eat hot-dogs, I have to participate in all the evil--potential or real--of eating that hot dog."

    Wow, Josh. I'm hoping that you didn't mean to do this, but you just literally called every person who eats a hot dog *evil*. Or, at the very least [and if there's even a difference] you called them participants *in* evil. And then you go on to imply that anyone who eats a hot dog is the "weaker" person in I Cor. 8.

    I understand your overall point about asking questions about our goods, and trying to recognize that we must consider their value in ways other than merely as instruments of our own happiness. Sure, I can follow you there.

    But... hot-dog eaters are weak-minded participants in evil? Really?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nathan,

    I'm so glad that you posted here. That is not the clearest writing I have ever written, and I by no means want to imply that hot-dog lovers are evil, beyond normal human sinfulness which includes me and every level-5 vegan. I in fact love a hot dog every now and then in certain contexts: particularly while camping or on the 4th of July. I used to eat a lot of hot-dogs as a kid, and every now and then I really enjoy them.
    I understand the 1 Corinthians passage to basically be saying the following:

    1. In Christ, you're free to eat whatever you want to eat, because there's really only one God.
    2. If your brother's conscience is bothered by meat sacrificed to idols, for him eating meat sacrificed to idols is sin because his conscience is defiled.
    3. Even though you can eat meat sacrificed to idols, if you do this around your brother with the weak conscience (perhaps me in this case), you are sinning against Christ.

    Now, if we equate the system in which hot-dogs are produced in our society today as "meat sacrificed to idols," perhaps the idols of Efficiency or Profit, then my post is the mere babbling of a fool. Because in that case, I, the person with the weak and defiled conscience am saying "hot dogs are wrong," while Paul is saying

    "We know that an idol is nothing at all in the world and that there is no God but one. For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as indeed there are many "gods" and many "lords"), yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live."

    And that actually may be the case. I don't know. Really. I don't. I'm trying to work this out.

    But, could it be that some of the top executives in this industry are Evangelical Christians, and could their "best practices" for business be harmful and unjust to some of their Christian brothers who work in the industry, or to their Christian brothers in the developing world who are harmed by the industry? What is my responsibility to God regarding those individuals? And what of God's creation? How am I honoring God by destroying his handiwork for my consumption?

    I actually don't know that hot dogs are a/the cause of all these problems. It could be that one company is really wicked in their practices of producing hot dogs, and another company is quite humane, pays their employees who are legal citizens a fair wage, and donates a lot of their profits to Evangelical missions and feeding starving children.

    The main point that Paul seems to make here, the way I read it, is don't let what you eat be the thing that makes a brother stumble. And you're right, that asking the question is what I'm trying to do.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh, and by the way Nathan, feel free to eat hot dogs around me any time. I wouldn't consider it sin. Unless you do. :)

    ReplyDelete